Mission: Impossible 2 – Film Review

Published March 10, 2025

Movie Details

Rating
C-
Director
John Woo
Writer
Robert Towne
Actors
Tom Cruise, Dougray Scott, Thandiwe Newton, Ving Rhames, Richard Roxburgh
Runtime
2 h 03 min
Release Date
May 24, 2000
Genres
Adventure, Action, Thriller
Certification

John Woo’s Mission: Impossible 2 (2000) is a film that revels in its style but struggles to deliver a compelling spy thriller worthy of its predecessor. Following the success of Brian De Palma’s 1996 Mission: Impossible, expectations were high for the sequel, especially with the action maestro John Woo at the helm. However, what could have been a slick and sophisticated espionage thriller instead devolves into an overly stylized, melodramatic, and often incoherent action film that sacrifices suspense and narrative depth for slow-motion gunfights, excessive romanticism, and gratuitous spectacle.

The film follows IMF agent Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) on a mission to retrieve a deadly biological weapon called “Chimera” before it falls into the wrong hands. The antagonist, rogue IMF agent Sean Ambrose (Dougray Scott), has stolen the virus and intends to unleash it upon the world, profiting from the sale of its cure. Hunt recruits a professional thief, Nyah Nordoff-Hall (Thandiwe Newton), who has a romantic history with Ambrose, to infiltrate his operation and retrieve the virus. What follows is a cat-and-mouse game filled with double-crosses, acrobatic stunts, and explosive action sequences.

While the premise itself is serviceable for an action spy film, its execution leaves much to be desired. The story lacks the intrigue and intelligence of the first film, feeling more like a generic action flick rather than a carefully woven espionage thriller. The plot beats are predictable, and the screenplay (written by Robert Towne) feels surprisingly basic for a film in the Mission: Impossible franchise. The narrative structure is uneven, bogged down by a forced romance and overly long action sequences that do little to advance the story.

Tom Cruise once again delivers a committed performance as Ethan Hunt, but the film does little to explore his character beyond surface-level heroics. While Mission: Impossible (1996) presented him as a resourceful, strategic agent navigating an intricate web of deception, the sequel reduces him to a typical action hero archetype. Cruise’s physical commitment is impressive—his free-climbing sequence in the opening is stunning—but the emotional depth of his character feels diminished.

Thandiwe Newton’s Nyah is introduced as a skilled thief, but she quickly becomes a damsel-in-distress rather than an active participant in the mission. Her romantic involvement with both Ethan and Ambrose is meant to add tension, but it instead feels artificial and uninspired. Her chemistry with Cruise is passable but nowhere near strong enough to carry the emotional weight the film tries to impose.

Dougray Scott’s Sean Ambrose is, unfortunately, a weak villain. His motivations are cliché, his presence lacks menace, and he never feels like a formidable adversary for Ethan. Compared to villains like Philip Seymour Hoffman‘s Owen Davian in Mission: Impossible III or Henry Cavill’s August Walker in Fallout, Ambrose is forgettable. His dialogue is filled with generic villain lines, and his dynamic with Ethan lacks the psychological complexity that could have made their rivalry more engaging.

Ving Rhames returns as Luther Stickell, providing some much-needed comic relief and continuity from the first film, but his role is relatively minor. The rest of the supporting cast, including Richard Roxburgh as Ambrose’s henchman and Brendan Gleeson as a pharmaceutical executive, fail to leave a lasting impression.

John Woo’s signature style is both the film’s greatest strength and its biggest flaw. Known for his use of slow-motion, balletic gunfights, and operatic action sequences, Woo brings an unmistakable visual flair to Mission: Impossible 2. However, the execution often feels excessive, prioritizing aesthetics over substance.

Many of the action scenes, such as the climactic motorcycle chase and the gunfight in Ambrose’s compound, are undeniably stylish but lack the visceral tension that makes action compelling. The overuse of slow-motion, doves, and dramatic pauses makes the film feel self-indulgent rather than exhilarating. While Woo’s Hard Boiled (1992) and Face/Off (1997) balanced emotional stakes with action, Mission: Impossible 2 often feels like a series of music video-style set pieces strung together with a weak narrative.

The hand-to-hand combat, particularly in the final act, is choreographed well, but the fight between Ethan and Ambrose lacks a true sense of danger or consequence. Instead, it becomes a drawn-out, stylized brawl that feels more like a showcase for Cruise’s physical prowess than a climactic confrontation with real stakes.

One of the most glaring missteps in Mission: Impossible 2 is its attempt to incorporate a love story at the center of the narrative. The romance between Ethan and Nyah feels forced, with little development beyond surface-level attraction. The film devotes a significant amount of time to their relationship, but it never becomes emotionally compelling.

A particular low point is the early seduction scene between Ethan and Nyah, which tries to establish chemistry through slow-motion glances and melodramatic music. Instead of adding depth to the characters, it feels contrived and out of place in a Mission: Impossible film. The franchise is at its best when it focuses on espionage, betrayal, and high-stakes missions, making this detour into romance feel like a miscalculation.

The biggest issue with Mission: Impossible 2 is its prioritization of action over intelligence. Where the first film thrived on tension, deception, and intricate plot twists, the sequel relies heavily on loud, exaggerated action sequences with little underlying substance. The heist elements, a staple of the franchise, are almost entirely absent, replaced by drawn-out shootouts and impractical stunts.

For instance, Ethan’s infiltration of the Biocyte facility to retrieve the virus lacks the precision and clever execution of the Langley break-in from the first film. Instead, it turns into a bombastic shootout that feels more like a generic action movie sequence than a Mission: Impossible set piece.

Similarly, Ambrose’s plan lacks the complexity that would make him a formidable opponent. Unlike the first film, where Ethan had to constantly outthink his enemies, Mission: Impossible 2 boils down to brute force rather than strategic espionage.

Mission: Impossible 2 is, unfortunately, one of the weakest entries in the franchise. While Tom Cruise’s dedication, John Woo’s stylish action, and Hans Zimmer’s dramatic score provide some entertainment value, the film ultimately feels hollow. The weak villain, underdeveloped romance, and excessive reliance on slow-motion action sequences make it a frustrating experience.

Compared to later entries like Ghost Protocol (2011), Rogue Nation (2015), and Fallout (2018), which masterfully blend high-stakes action with intricate storytelling, Mission: Impossible 2 feels like a relic of early 2000s action cinema that prioritizes aesthetics over substance. It’s a film that looks cool but lacks the intelligence, tension, and narrative strength that make the Mission: Impossible series great.